NC Community Colleges Lobby against federal student loans

The Presidents of 38 North Carolina community colleges have come together to oppose a new State law that required them to offer federal student loans to their student body from 1 July 2011.

As written, would the law college participation in the federal student loan program. The non-participating community colleges say they are afraid of all federal student aid-which grants for students with low incomes-if too many student loans default losses.

Current federal regulations punish colleges and universities whose default rates on federal education loans more than 25 percent by making these schools are not eligible for federal financial aid resources for students. A school standard rate is currently measured by looking at how many of her students default on a federal education loan within two years after the refund on that loan entered into force.

Under new federal higher education reform rules will take effect in 2012, the standard rate threshold for eligibility for federal financial aid will increase to 30 per cent but more than three years, instead of two years will be measured. At national level, the standard rate for federal student loan of 7 percent to almost 14% over three years instead of two measured.

North Carolina works at this time, the nation's third-largest community college system. Community college graduates account for about half of all college degrees earned in North Carolina.

State legislators passed the new legislation in 2010 as a response to the continuing economic downturn and the conclusion that North Carolina is one of only four States where at least 40% of the community college students don't have access to federal education loans. Nearly 200,000 North Carolina community college students would be eligible for federal loans under the new Bill.

Proponents of the legislation say that students have the opportunity to determine how to pay for their college education, while critics charge that students have access to other college scholarships and subsidies that reduce or even eliminate the need for school loans for themselves.

More than 116,000 students enrolled in a degree program at one of the State community college campuses in the school year 2008-09-approximately half of all degree students received financial aid. In the lectures to the federal student loan program shall have about 25,000 students loans from the Federal University. These borrowers accounted for approximately 10 percent of the State student loan recipients.

Community college campus Presidents who opposed the mandate to offer federal school loans say that their students do not need additional access to loans and that such students can access their federal loan dollars spend on non-essential and non-educational costs.

Other Presidents say that their college campuses dozens of scholarships and grants from the foundation that are not awarded because students simply do not apply for the funds. Still others say that their student body is primarily composed of students who are among the first in their families to attend college and don't have the background or resources to manage carefully academic loans.

The view that community college students school loans to help pay for their academic costs need not be supported by the American Association of Community Colleges, which States that community college programs are designed to specifically to minimize the need for substantial financial assistance.

However, while education costs at North Carolina's two-year colleges on average only slightly more than $ 1,800, the annual cost of attendance rises to more than 15,000 dollars when the cost of books, fees, and living is factored.

Not all campus heads of North Carolina's community colleges share the concerns about their students take on debt from loans from the Federal University. Some community colleges Welcome the legislation, saying that the provision of federal education loans is a way to ensure that their students need to be able to choose between staying in the classroom and paying for rent or childcare.

Deborah Lamm, President of Edgecombe Community College, a school in one of the poorest areas of the State, says that the students access to loans from the school to attend college because the need for financial aid increases. They took out a growth of nearly 50% of its school enrollment over the past two years and a jump in the number of students who Edgecombe school loans to 18 percent in 2009 from 8% in 2007.

Officials of the u.s. Department of education saying that none of the North Carolina community colleges participating in federal student loan program currently risk being penalized for high default rates.

View the original article here

Consumer law report blasts for-profit Colleges for Private-Label student loans

A new report issued in January by the national consumer Law Center accuses for-profit colleges of saddling their students with non-regulated private-label student loans that these students force with high interest rates, excessive debt and predatory lending terms that make it difficult for these students to succeed.

The report, titled "Piling it on: the growth of pharmaceutical loans and the consequences for schoolchildren," examines the boom in the past three years in private student loan programs offered by schools directly instead of by a third party lenders. This institutional loans are offered by so-called "private schools"-for-profit career colleges, schools and vocational training programmes.

Federal vs. private education loans

Most loans for students is one of two types: Government-funded federal student loans, guaranteed and under the supervision of the u.s. Department of education; or non-Federal private student loans, issued by banks, credit unions, and other private lenders. (Some students may also benefit from State-funded college loans available in some States for resident students.)

Private student loans, unlike federal undergraduate loans, on the basis of credit loans, where the borrower student have sufficient credit history and income, or else a credit worthy co-signer.

The beginning of the Proprietary school loans

After the financial crisis in 2008 which was fuelled, in part by the lax lending practices that drove the subprime mortgage boom, set lenders in all industries more credit requirements for private consumer loans and credit lines.

Many private student loan companies stopped offering their loans to students who participate in for-profit colleges, such as these students historically weaker credit profiles and a higher standard than students at nonprofit colleges and universities.

These movements made it difficult for private schools to meet the requirements of the Federal financial aid for which colleges and universities to receive at least 10 percent of their income from sources other than federal student aid.

To compensate for the withdrawal of the private student loan companies from their campuses, started some for-profit colleges to offer own school loans to their students. Private school are essentially private-label issued student loans, and funded by the school itself rather than by a third party lender.

Proprietary loans as standard Traps

The NCLC Report counts that this private school loans predatory lending terms contain high interest rates and large loan origination fees charging and low underwriting standards, allowing students with bad credit history and insufficient income considerable sums of money that they are in little position to be able to borrow to pay back.

Moreover, such proprietary loans often require students to make payments while they are still in school, and the loans run certain very sensitive by default. A single late payment may result in a standard loan, together with the student's expulsion from the academic program. Several for-profit schools will remember copies of borrowers whose loans are in default proprietary, making it almost impossible for these students to resume their studies elsewhere without starting.

The NCLC Report notes that more than half of the loans from the home University go in standard and are never refunded.

Recommendations for reform

Currently, consumers have little protection of private lenders. Private school loans are not subject to federal supervision credit products is caused by most banks and credit unions regulates.

In addition, some private schools claim that their private student loans not "loans" at all, but rather a form of "consumer finance"-a distinction, NCLC costs, that is "presumably an attempt to evade the disclosure requirements, such as the federal truth in Lending Act" as a semantic maneuver meant to skirt state banking regulations.

The authors of the NCLC make a report series of recommendations for reform private school loans. The recommendations call for tough federal oversight of both proprietary and private student loans.

Under the NCLC of approved reforms are requirements that private student loan companies and proprietary lenders comply with federal truth-in-lending laws; regulations that prohibit proprietary loans count to a school required percentage of non-federal revenues; implementation of tracking of private and proprietary loan debt and default rates in the National Student loan data, which currently numbers only federal education loans; and centralized monitoring to ensure that the for-profit schools their true default rates on their private-label student loans cannot disguise.

Other proposed reforms include the NCLC supports Amendment of federal bankruptcy law and extension of federal college loan debt relief programs.

The NCLC advocates a revision of the current bankruptcy laws allowing student borrowers to discharge the heavy student loan debt in a bankruptcy petition without complying with the current, almost-impossible-to-to "undue hardship" tests. In the midst of more relaxed bankruptcy rules and enhanced non-bankruptcy alternatives, the NCLC maintains, less borrowers would find themselves hopelessly mired in student loan debt.

View the original article here